š§š»āāļø Moloch media
I have been on a distinctly anti-genocidal bent in recent months, which has been somewhat career-limiting. Instead of using the platform of LinkedIn to humblebrag about my many successes, I have mostly been highlighting the continuing atrocities being committed by Western governments in Gaza, along with the moral depravity of our leaders and media.
I do this in the hope that we might galvanise some courage to act in the best interests of humanity and the planet we share. Iām not sure I believe in my hope, but I do believe there exists a world in which we can coordinate amidst complexity at scale.* A world in which we can work together towards mutual flourishing (or at least towards a future that is not entirely grim). Thus I am of course against the use of unilateral violence as a means to solve problems; always and especially when it sees children, women, journalists, doctors and nurses, aid workers, innocent civilians and non-combatants killed or harmed, violating international human rights law.
* Such is my curse.
So: recently, I did my grumpy wizard thing and posted on LinkedIn something about how āmainstream media is the scourgeā. Iāve been witnessing disinformation happen in real time; from direct footage from multiple on-the-ground sources right through to the distorted Official Narratives promulgated by our mainstream media outlets. Iāve seen the pattern play out many, many times.
Fear, disinformation and atrocity propaganda are incredibly effective tools when deployed to an apathetic society that has forgotten its agency.
On that note, I do sense a shift turning. But it requires a few more of usāespecially in Western societiesāto wake up. Not to become āwokeā per se,* but aware enough to question the information in our feeds. What we subsume shapes what we presume, and so on.
* Wokeness is a necessary stage, but not a meta-stable one (nor healthy). Once becoming aware of all of our deep complicity in systemic inequality, suffering and hurt, we must sublimate this into a more mature (albeit grief-laden) āpost-wokeā stanceālest we regress to the āanti-wokeā stance.
A while ago philosopher Hannah Arendt wrote that:
āThe ideal subject of totalitarian rule
is not the convinced Nazi or Communist,
but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction
and the distinction between true and false
no longer exists.ā
It can seem that we are on the path to this. But in my recent bemoaning of āmainstream mediaā my friend Col Fink offered a very useful reframe:
āI call it the Corporate Media, because the views published are not mainstream views, they're the views of corporate entities existing only for the purpose of maximising shareholder value. They are, therefore, almost utterly devoid of ethics.ā
I very much appreciate this reframe, as it disentangles and absolves the mainstream audience from the media monopoly that allows for mainstream distribution.
Corporations
But what is the ācorporateā behind Corporate Media.
Corporations are bodies. But unlike we living beings embodied in corporeal form, corporations are entities manifested via inter-subjective belief; egregores that have a body yet no corporeal form. They exist, yet they arenāt quite real.
Each of these egregores self-organise around profit maximisation. They have warlocks who oversee their affairs, and thralls who sacrifice time and talent to do their bidding.*
* I am being dramatic for effect here: not all corporations are bad. Many are quite good; they strive and mean well. But the rivalrous dynamics of our current system requires that we compete: for resources, for attention, for market share. It is what it is. The wiser corporations are doing this whilst also positioning themselves for the new paradigms that are emergingābut thatās a tale for another time. Indulge me as I weave something to make my obscure point here.
But thereās something that lies behind these eldritch corporations. Something far more sinister.
Moloch
The god of coordination failure and child sacrifice.
Moloch is the reason why we canāt have nice things. If we all cooperated, we could surmount most of what ails our worldāfrom climate to food to housing to conservation, and more. We could live in relative abundance and generative homeodynamics.
But no. Moloch will ensure we have the tragedy of the commons, a race to the bottom, free-riders, prisonerās dilemmas, inequality, polarisation and zero-sum game dynamics. This is largely due to perverse incentives that have bodies (from individual to corporate) act in their own self-interest, rather than the collective good.
This largely manifests as multi-polar traps. If making your news item just a little bit more sensational rather than factual translates to more clicks (thanks to A/B split-testing), which in turn translates to more dollars via advertising revenueāthen it makes sense for a profit-maximising body to do this.
The result being: every body does thisāmaking it near impossible to decipher fact from fiction amidst the hyperbole and hype.
āAs for-profit enterprises, corporate media are beholden to their investors and their advertisers,ā Khaled Al Sabawi writes. āWhile they may claim that their aim is to balance profits with journalistic standards, when push comes to shove, it's profits that take precedence.ā
Hence I wonder if all corporate media is ultimately Moloch Media.
Moloch media
āis any media that serves the interest of those producing it at the expense of collective whole.
This isnāt journalism in the service of truthāitās propaganda in service of those who benefit from the beliefs that are shaped by the stories that are shared.
I posit this not to encourage conspiracy theories. Most conspiracies require significant coordination to pull off effectivelyāand Moloch sees to it that these too will fail. No, I mean this simply as an observation of emergent phenomena.
Power (like wealth) tends to centralise, creating asymmetry. Once an entity becomes powerful, it is natural that they seek to grow and protect the power they have amassed; thus they use their power to shape laws, opinion, and beliefs.*
* Hereās a tip: read widely, and draw from multiple sourcesābig and small, conservative and progressive. Strive for independent outlets where possible, and primary sources where possible. Always investigate their source of funding, and what political motives may be behind it. Avoid extreme āleftā and ārightā (neither frame is helpful)ābut donāt fall into the bog of being a ācentristā. Instead, be metamodern: oscillate, contemplate, and develop your own proto-synthesis. Develop your own perspectiveābut be open to updating your stance as new information comes to light.
Whenever we are presented with a story, we must ask: who does this serve?
Itāll never be purely collective goodāthereās always an element of self-interest at play. But if the answer is anything less than āmostly the collective goodā then: keep your wits about you. This could be the workings of Moloch media.